Hey everyone! I'm curious if anyone has built their SaaS or product using server side rendering (SSR), aside from just landing pages and blogs. If you've employed SSR in your company or startup, could you share why you chose that approach? I've been using client side rendering (CSR) for ages, but I'm wondering if there's a solid reason to switch to SSR, especially for applications with a lot of dynamic content.
4 Answers
If your CSR setup is running smoothly and users are satisfied, it might not be worth the hassle to switch. But, if you're facing slow load times or want to improve SEO, then SSR could be a good upgrade. It really depends on your current performance and user needs.
Yeah, that's a common concern! Many sites stick with SSR for pages that are mostly static—like landing pages or blogs—because it serves content more efficiently. But for apps that require constant dynamic interaction, SSR can often be unnecessary, unless you have specific performance issues.
SSR is great for creating a better user experience with faster initial loads and improved navigation through the app. It reduces the rendering workload because you can mark more content as static, leading to quicker execution. Overall, SSR helps build more responsive apps, even dynamic and authenticated ones.
SSR can really boost your SEO because search engines can analyze the server-generated content more effectively. Plus, it tends to load a bit faster since the browser can start rendering before waiting for the entire code to load, unlike CSR. If getting better SEO and speed matters to you, then SSR might be the way to go!
Related Questions
Cloudflare Origin SSL Certificate Setup Guide
How To Effectively Monetize A Site With Ads